Mary
Laughren
University
of Queensland
ALS
Workshop on Complex Predicates
TITLE:
The role of Warlpiri verbalizers in forming complex predicates
ABSTRACT:
Nash
(1982:) observes that Warlpiri has about 115 inflecting verbs, and discusses
the structure of the Warlpiri verbal complex, classifying the various coverbal
(or preverb) morphemes in terms of their distributional and semantic
properties. A small number of the Warlpiri inflecting verbs are strictly
verbalizers in the sense that they must combine with another predicative
morpheme in order to constitute an autonomous verb. Some of these verbalizers,
such as -mani
in (1a) are homophonous with independent verbs with which they share some
semantic and syntactic properties but others such as -jirrirni in (1b&c) or -mani in (1d) are not.[1]
(1) a. Parraja-kurra[-ma-ni]
ka-lu karnta-ngku.
coolimon-allat[-caus-np] pres-3pl.s woman-erg
'Women
put them into coolimons.'
b. Ngaka ka ngapa-ngku
marna=lku purrulyan[-jirri-rni].
later
pres
water-erg grass=change
sprout[-caus-np]
'Then
the rain makes the grass sprout.'
c. Puluku ka-lu-jana maliki-rli
warlkurr[-jirri-rni
munga-rlangu-rla.
cow
pres-3pl.s-3pl.o dog-erg bark[-effect-np]
night-example-loc
'Dogs
bark (at) cows at night typically.'
d. Maliki
ka warlkurr[-mani].
dog
pres
bark[-produce
sound]
'The
dog barks.'
The verbalizers which
either determine or participate in the construction of predicate argument structure (PAS) as
well as in the expression of lexical conceptual structure (LCS), must be
distinguished from those (even where homophonous with the former class) which
do not contribute to the PAS but which express aspectual notions such as
inception or duration of an event. As illustrated in (2a&b) the inflecting
verb -yani
combines with the infinitival forms of an inflecting verb (and its coverbs) and
expresses duration, while in (2c) the inflecting verb -njini is suffixed to a non-past verb stem
expressing the inception of an activity.
(2) a. Maliki
ka warlkurr-ma-ninja[-ya-ni].
dog
pres
bark-produce_sound-inf[-go-np]
'The
dog goes along barking.' or 'The dog keeps barking.'
b. Puluku
ka-lu-jana
maliki-rli
warlkurr-jirri-rninja[-ya-ni].
cow
pres-3pl.s-3pl.o
dog-erg bark-effect-inf[-go-np]
'Dogs
go along barking at cows.'
c. Maliki
ka warlkurr-mani[-nji-ni].
dog
pres
bark-produce_sound[-start-np]
'The
dog goes and barks.'
The
inflecting verbs in (1) form part of a complex verbal phrase (VP) where PAS is
defined, whereas the inflecting verbs in (2) seem to occupy a higher aspectual
node which governs the VP, but which cannot effect the PAS (as reflected in the
transitivity and case marking). All inflecting verbs must check TAM features;
does this require movement (either overt or covert) to a position dominated by
a node which also dominates the VP?
This
paper will present a brief overview of the Warlpiri verbal complex (reviewing
NashÕs 1982 classification of the preverbs) arguing that it can be formally
defined as the constituent which may be immediately governed by a directional
head, and which may enter into a relationship with the functional categories of
tense, aspect and mood. The relative productivity of these verbalizers will
also be discussed.
Reference:
Nash, D.G. 1982. ÒWarlpiri preverbs and verb roots.Ó Stephen Swartz (ed.) Papers in
Warlpiri grammar: in memory of Lothar Jagst
Work Papers of SIL-AAB, Series A Volume
6. Berrimah, N.T.: SIL-AAB:165-216.
[1] The following abbreviations are used: allat = allative case, caus = causative, erg = ergative case, inf = infinitive, loc = locative, np= non-past, o = object, pl = plural, pres = present, s = subject